EDITORIAL STANDARDS, ETHICS & GUIDELINES

---

The Mitchell Report adheres to rigorous editorial, ethical, and professional standards to preserve editorial independence, integrity, and public trust. Our work is grounded in careful analysis, factual accuracy, and intellectual honesty.

Editorial Independence

The Mitchell Report operates with a strong commitment to editorial independence, meaning we do not accept payment, gifts, incentives, or editorial direction in exchange for coverage or favorable treatment. All commentary and analysis reflects the independent judgment of the author.

The publication is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or aligned with any political party, advocacy organization, corporation, or government entity.

Accuracy & Verification

Although The Mitchell Report is primarily a commentary and analysis publication, we prioritize fact verification. Factual claims are made in good faith and verified prior to publication whenever possible.

Sources may include:

- public records

- statutes and regulations

- court filings

- government publications

- reputable, widely reported sources

We avoid speculation, rumor, and unverified assertions.

Opinion vs. Fact

The Mitchell Report clearly distinguishes between:

- Opinion and analysis (argument, interpretation, commentary)

- Factual claims supported by documentation or reliable sources

Opinion pieces reflect the views of the author. Strong viewpoints are permitted and encouraged, but opinions are never presented as verifiable fact without evidentiary support.

Fairness & Integrity

We strive to present issues with clarity and uphold journalism integrity. We avoid misleading framing, selective quotation, distortion of sources, or bad-faith argumentation.

Criticism may be pointed, contrarian, or critical, but it is rooted in reasoned analysis rather than personal attacks.

Transparency & Disclosure

If a story involves a potential conflict of interest, relevant information is disclosed. Articles that include opinion or analysis (rather than straight reporting) are clearly identified as such.

The Mitchell Report operates under a single-author editorial model. All published content reflects the independent viewpoint of its founder, Andrellos Mitchell.

Corrections & Accountability

If a material factual error is identified, we correct it promptly and transparently. Substantive corrections are noted at the end of the relevant article.

Disagreement with editorial judgment, interpretation, or opinion does not constitute grounds for correction.

What We Publish

- Commentary and analysis

- Legal and policy criticism

- Cultural, media, and institutional analysis

What We Do Not Publish

- Undisclosed sponsored content

- Promotional or “puff” pieces presented as editorial

- Affiliate marketing disguised as reporting

Guest Submissions

The Mitchell Report does not accept unsolicited guest submissions at this time.

Use of AI Tools

AI tools may be used for:

- drafting assistance

- formatting

- research support

All final editorial decisions, opinions, and published content reflect the judgment and responsibility of a human editor.

Reader Engagement

We welcome responsible dialogue and fact-based disagreement. Abusive, defamatory, or misleading submissions will not be published or entertained.